Nava Nirmana Deeksha Is Only A Pretense

• Agreed on that day and objecting today?
• AP’s benefits mortgaged for Note for Vote case’s shelving
• Scams in a great number, no schemes for welfare
• Babu’s brain becomes a centre for evil thoughts
• Babu’s rule is scary and words are deceptive

 Hyderabad: YSR Congress Party slammed the Nava Nirmana Deeksha
staged by AP CM Chandrababu Naidu and called it a deceptive act coming from the
person who was the reason behind the state’s bifurcation. The party released an
announcement this morning in this regard. It called Chandrababu a person with Hitler
ideology.

Chandrababu had sent not one or two, but four letters to the
centre to make the bifurcation happen. Telugu Desam Parliamentary Party was
made to announce that the first vote in approval of bifurcation was theirs. Now
he was staging Nava Nirmana Deeksha like nothing had happened, criticised
YSRCP.

According to the pledge of Nava Nirmana Deeksha to rise against
corruption and conspiracy, the people’s aim should apparently be Chandrababu’s
Government. Chandrababu had mortgaged the waters of River Krishna and River
Godavari to Telangana Government and the state’s special status to the central
Government in order to avoid inquiry on Note for Vote case, criticised YSRCP.
It questioned it was unbelievable to see Chandrababu conducting Nava Nirmana
Deeksha, after having sold the state’s development as well as the
life-sustaining river waters.

YSR Congress Party also commented on the tyrannical rules set by
TDP Government commanding every single person to participate in the deeksha, to
stand still at 11 am wherever they were and remarked that Chandrababu’s brain
was working in emergency kind of way. YSR Congress Party complained that there
had not been rule in the past two years, no welfare schemes, but only scams. It
complained that agricultural sector had been destroyed under TDP rule and there
was no hope left for Krishna and Godavari waters being released.

YSRCP also commented that there was no hope for special status
or the realization of promises mentioned in bifurcation act, nor was there hope
for industrial discounts or job opportunities. It questioned why the people of
the state should stand still when ordered by Chandrababu and read a pledge
about what would happen by 2022, 2029 and 2050, if Chandrababu and TDP would
not offer commitment about the action to be taken in the next 2-3 years. It
concluded that Chandrababu’s practices were tyrannical and words were
deceptive.