YS Jagan Mohan Reddy expressed grief over the demise of Sri Shanti SwaroopA Peep Into CM Jagan’s Heart Of Gold!YS Jagan Mohan Reddy expressed delight over Bharat Ratna awardsAP Leads From the Forefront Disbursing Over Rs 4 Lakh Crore to the Poor via DBTYSRCP's Impactful Welfare MeasuresYSRCP Highlights Plight of Dalits During Naidu's RuleTDP, a BC Leader Factory, Yet No Representation in Rajya Sabha – Why?Invested Rs 1,600 crore dedicatedly for the development of Kodur‘Real development is providing quality education to poor and investing in human capital,’Samajika Sadhikara bus yatra in Araku Valley, Anantapur
Sanksaree vs Ahankaree
20 Oct 2018 11:52 AM
We have heard about Sanskaris and Ahankaris. To know how they look like, one has to just see YS Jagan and Chandrababu. Young Jagan is picture perfect of manners, respect and courteous behaviour, while Chandrababu is personification of arrogance and power-mongering. The language he uses is insulting and demeaning.
The moment Chandrababu attains power, his language changes and he turns abusive. YS Jagan on the other hand has never used such language. Abuse, invective and attacks are an anathema to YS Jagan. His language even when criticizing, is sober.
Even after 22 of his MLA defected, YS Jagan had never used cuss words for them. He had never abused them. He was sober while referring to them. He only demanded that they resign their posts and prove that the people support them despite their defection. When Chandraabu insulted the Opposition inside the house, Jagan did not react violently. He simply said that Assembly was no longer the place for the Opposition to voice the people’s concerns and boycotted it.
The lesson here is that Chandrababu may be ahankaree… but Jagan is Sanskaree. Chandrababu is like a sea, but it can’t quench anyone’s thirst. Jagan is like a well. Water oozes out always and it quenches the thirst of many people. Chandrababu may be the CM, but he does not fulfil any promise and does no good to the people. Jagan may not be the CM, but he has people at the centre of all his thinking and at the centre of all his politics.