*Amaravati mega city raises viability concerns; call for time-bound plan for capital and Rayalaseema*

Tirupati, April 22: Rayalaseema Intellectuals Forum Coordinator M. Purushottam Reddy called for a public debate on the financial viability of Amaravati, questioning whether a debt-driven mega capital is feasible given the state’s current economic condition. He cautioned that globally, new cities like Noida and Lavasa have struggled due to lack of population and sustainability, raising doubts on Amaravati’s long-term success. He stressed that building a city from scratch is economically risky, while integrating existing urban centers is more practical and viable.
He accused certain individuals of distorting history around Amaravati and clarified that Kurnool was chosen as capital under the Sri Bagh Pact during state formation. He demanded that the government present a clear, time-bound action plan not only for the capital but also for Rayalaseema irrigation projects like Handri-Neeva and Rayalaseema Lift, which require about Rs 40,000 crore.
Highlighting the financial burden, he stated that basic infrastructure in Amaravati alone would cost around Rs 2 lakh crore, while the government must also continue paying annual annuity to farmers until plots are developed and handed over, creating a long-term fiscal strain. He pointed out that loans taken for the project come with heavy interest obligations, significantly increasing the debt burden over time.
Citing examples like Chandigarh and Naya Raipur, he questioned whether Amaravati can realistically achieve large-scale urban growth, noting that even developed regions like Noida face habitation challenges. In contrast, he said the MAVIGUN model—linking Machilipatnam, Vijayawada, and Guntur—offers a more viable alternative by leveraging existing infrastructure, population, and economic activity, enabling faster and cost-effective development.
He emphasized that Rayalaseema has already lost opportunities due to capital decisions and urged the government to ensure balanced regional development with clear timelines. Concluding, he warned that without financial prudence and practical planning, Amaravati could become an unsustainable burden on the state.